Association of British Drivers debunk the 1/3 Claim on "speed related" crashes

Articles

Studies Show

Association of British Drivers

Mar 09 |01:45

Association of British Drivers debunk the 1/3 Claim on "speed related" crashes used by the Scamera side.

http://www.abd.org.uk/one_third.htm

The Biggest Lie of All
"A third of accidents are caused by speed"

The road safety industry have long asserted that speed causes a third of accidents, and this has become a fundamental plank of their road safety thinking, such as it is.
However, they admit that proper research into accident causation has never been carried out. [PACTS 1997]

The Transport Research Laboratory was commissioned to investigate a new type of form for police officers to report on road traffic accidents they attend. This form was designed to produce more accurate data on causal factors.

The results of this investigation, published in report TRL323, showed that excess speed was a factor (but not necessarily the only factor) in 7.3% of accidents.

Of course, this small problem did not divert the DLTR, who were by this time politically welded to the great 'one third' lie.

They got around their little problem by defining all sorts of other accident causes as "speed related" until they managed to get them to add up to a third.

Here the ABD exposes this and demonstrates the complete bankruptcy of thought prevalent in the road safety industry today.

Below is the table from TRL323 report (Page 9, Table 2) upon which the 'one third' lie is based.

The accident causes highlighted in green are those which the government claims are 'speed related'. Adding these up gives a total of 30%, which they then conveniently round up to 'one third'.

On the right are our comments on each of these items.

Accident Cause	Definite factors	Definite factors	ABD comments
	Qtt	%
Failure to judge other persons path or speed	623	10.7%	It is utter nonsense to class this as a 'speed related accident'. The situation here is one person failing to judge the path or speed of a second vehicle — which is not to say that the second vehicle is travelling at an inappropriate or illegal speed. It is purely a failure to observe correctly on the part of the first party.
Behaviour - careless/thoughtless/reckless	513	8.8%
Inattention	465	8.0%
Looked but did not see	436	7.5%
Excessive speed	424	7.3%	This is the only cause that is genuinely to do with speed. Note the percentage of 7.3%, hardly one third is it? Nor it is even the most significant cause of accidents, it comes fifth. We guess that telling the public that speed is responsible for only one thirteenth of accidents just didn't suit their purpose, so they dropped a '1' and made it one third instead.
Lack of judgment of own path	369	6.3%
Failed to look	365	6.2%
Following too close	238	4.1%	Again absolutely nothing to do with speed, you can drive too close to the vehicle in front at 1mph!
Impairment — alcohol	222	3.8%
Slippery road	175	3.0%	Now they are really getting silly. Imagine a truck spills diesel onto a 30mph road. You are driving along this road at 30mph and skid on the diesel patch resulting in an accident, and they claim this is a speed related accident? Twaddle, absolute twaddle.
Inexperience of driving	163	2.8%
Behaviour — in a hurry	157	2.7%	Being in a hurry does not mean travelling at excessive speed, it could include not waiting patiently at junctions, roundabouts or pedestrian crossings; not giving way to other traffic. If the vehicle was travelling at excessive speed the accident cause would be classed under 'Excessive Speed'.
Site details — bend / winding road	131	2.2%
Surroundings — stationary or parked vehicle	112	1.9%
Crossed from behind parked vehicle, etc	105	1.8%
Surroundings — bend / winding road	104	1.8%
Behaviour — panic	91	1.6%
Aggressive driving	80	1.4%	Again, this is not speed related, you can be aggressive at 5mph in a supermarket car park!
Behaviour — nervous / uncertain	69	1.2%
Other — (personal)	64	1.1%
Impairment — illness	58	1.0%
Distraction — physical outside vehicle	57	1.0%
Surroundings — buildings, fences, vegetation	56	1.0%
Failed to see pedestrian or vehicle in blindspot	56	1.0%
View — glare from the sun	55	0.9%
Impairment — fatigue	48	0.8%
Weather (eg mist or sleet)	45	0.8%	Perhaps the most ridiculous of all. This means that the accident was caused by the weather not speed, i.e. the vehicle was travelling at a perfectly reasonable speed but encountered some unexpected problem such as flooding on the roadway, or black ice. Again, if the vehicle at been travelling at excessive speed for the conditions it would have been classed under 'Excessive Speed' above.
Distraction — physical in/on vehicle	45	0.8%
Site details — narrow road	41	0.7%
Distraction — stress / emotional state of mind	39	0.7%
Inexperience of vehicle	37	0.6%
Surroundings — moving vehicle	31	0.5%
Animal out of control	29	0.5%
Site details — steep hill	28	0.5%
Other vehicle defects	26	0.4%
Tyres — deflation before impact	26	0.4%
Tyres — worn / insufficient tread	26	0.4%
Other (Local conditions)	24	0.4%	The inclusion of 'other' is an indication of the extent of the government's addiction to speed. They are so convinced that speed is the be-all and end-all of accident causation that if they can't attribute an accident to anything else, they conclude it must be speed related.
Site details — poor road surface	23	0.4%
Site details — roadworks	23	0.4%
Interaction or competition with other road users	23	0.4%
Defective brakes	22	0.4%
Site details — inadequate signing	17	0.3%
Impairment — drugs	17	0.3%
Ignored lights at crossing	15	0.3%
Person hit wore dark or inconspicuous clothing	15	0.3%
Disability	14	0.2%
Site details — poor / no street lighting	14	0.2%
Tyres — wrong pressure	9	0.2%
View — windows obscured	6	0.1%
High winds	6	0.1%
Defective lights or signals	5	0.1%
Earlier accident	4	0.1%
View — glare from headlights	1	0.0%

Number of factors reported	5847	100%

The Truth

The government are so addicted to the notion the speed is the major cause of accidents that they are prepared to go to any lengths to make the public believe it. Even when their blatant lies are exposed, they still continue to peddle them.

You can fool some of the people all of the time,
and all of the people some of the time,
but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.
Abraham Lincoln 1809-1865

Why do they lie about speed?

So they can:

justify wasting public money on speed cameras
justify extorting millions of pounds every year from perfectly safe drivers
force drivers to travel at increasingly lethargic speeds so that one of the main benefits of cars over public transport is taken away
literally force drivers onto public transport by taking away their driving licences

Speed is simply not the issue it is made out to be. Sheer bad driving is the cause of most accidents, and travelling at excessive speed for the conditions is just another form of bad driving. Yet the government does virtually nothing to improve general driving standards. It even takes experienced police patrols off our roads, which makes the situation worse!

The government is not really interested in improving road safety, it is only interested in making life hell for drivers.

Set as favorite

Bookmark

Email this

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Write comment

Articles Menu

Find Info

Anti-Camera Protest T-Shirts!

Getting ready for a protest, or just want to show your opposition to Red Light Cameras and support groups like Ban the Cams in our fight? Buy a T-Shirt today!

Click here for more information.

Latest Comments

Murfreesbo ro Citizens Against Photo Enforcemen t: RLC INTERSECTI ONS CRASHES INCREASED!
This is not unusual, it has been documented many times in places all over the wo...
Jeff Clemens who STRIPPED RLC REFORM BILL SB 1342 of REAL REFORMS like DUE PROCESS, gets defensive
If Senator Clemens actually wanted greater safety in Florida, he would require t...
Kansas City drops RLC ticket in FEAR of HIGHER COURTS!
Louisiana passed a law that says that these traffic camera invoices cannot be tu...
Kansas City drops RLC ticket in FEAR of HIGHER COURTS!
I would not worry about it as I do not believe they report to any DMV. I never ...
Kansas City drops RLC ticket in FEAR of HIGHER COURTS!
We need to know what state the ticket came out of.

Title
Comment	smaller \| bigger
Name
Email
Write the displayed characters
Subscribe via email (registered users only)