Speed Camera News
Speed CAMERA HYPOCRITE: Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
Speed CAMERA HYPOCRITE: Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
http://www.stopbigbrothermd.org/2011/08/optotraffic-representative-caught.html
Thursday, August 25, 2011
Optotraffic Representative Caught Speeding
Public records reveal that the senior official and spokesperson for Lanham-based Optotraffic was recently issued a speeding ticket for traveling 15mph over the legally posted speed limit.
The Baltimore City court record shows Mickey E Shepherd was issued the ticket on 4/06/2011 at 3:38pm by an officer in the MD Transportation Authority Tunnel Command for traveling at the dangerous speed of 70mph in his red Nissan with license plate #6CXT98. Mr Shepherd plead guilty to the charge and was given "probation before judgement" on 6/10/2011, which normally means that the defendant receives no points and the violation may be stricken from their driving record. The record shows he was ordered to paid a fine of $70 plus court costs.
Mr Shepherd is the Senior Account Manager handling Optotraffic's speed camera contracts including those in Prince George's County, College Park, and Forest Heights. He frequently appears at local government hearings and media/public relations events speaking about the dangers of speeding while selling speed camera services.
Mr Shepherd has also been appearing as an 'expert witness' at speed camera hearings of defendants who received tickets from Optotraffic cameras located in Prince George's County municipalities. In those cases he often presents testimony about the workings of the devices without being required to document or prove his claims. Under its speed camera contracts, Optotraffic receives a percentage cut of every citation to build, deploy, maintain, and processes violation from cameras, as well as mailing citations. Optotraffic has also been permitted by the Prince George's County Court system to schedule court hearings. This gives the company substantial control over the chain of evidence submitted at hearings and also the time and circumstances in which court hearings are held. As a result the company has some ability to influence the outcome of speed camera court hearings in which they have a substantial financial, marketing, and public relations stake.
Mr Shepherd did not respond to an emailed request for comment about this speeding offense after more than 24 hours.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
Find Info
Latest Comments
-
As Use Of License Plate Scanners Spreads, Privacy Concerns Deepen
I like it very much especially the information you have putted here is like trai...
-
IL bill to REQUIRE PLUS 1 second Yellow lights at RLC stalled.
Senator Michael Doherty (R-23), the sponsor of legislation that would result in ...
-
MD SCAMERAS FLOUTING THEIR OWN LAW: Not Independen
tly Certified
What Maryland regulations require a leasing company to notify the lessee that he...
-
SCAMERA ALERT: GULF BREEZE, FL
i got a ticket there and the light just turned yellow, what do they want me to d...
-
Texas: Citizen Activists Target Red Light Camera Expenditur
es
Your mayor and city council are the ones who brought red light cameras to your c...








