Legislative News WHO PAID THOSE SCAMERA OFFICERS TO LOBBY AND SHOULD THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED TO LOBBY?????
WHO PAID THOSE SCAMERA OFFICERS TO LOBBY AND SHOULD THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED TO LOBBY?????
Of equal question on these articles on committee vote to ban RLC: http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/florida/fl-red-light-cameras-debated-20110420,0,5850022.story and http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/bill-repeal-red-light-cameras-clears-final-house-committee
WHO IS PAYING FOR THOSE OFFICERS TO BE THERE TRYING TO SAVE THE SCAM? Most people don't have the time or resources to go there. And could Wandall's "expenses" be paid by someone else or some other company?????
Ban the CAMs only had a day notice of the ban bill being on the agenda. Yet these "officers" had "time" to take off of work and drive up (or maybe fly) to Tallahassee and LOBBY??
WERE THOSE OFFICERS PAID TO BE THERE! IF SO WHERE THEY REGISTERED Lobbyist????
In Wandall's case she acts more like a lobbyist than a local citizen: http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/30/3076.asp
"No person shall provide compensation for lobbying to any individual or business entity that is not a lobbying firm," Florida Statutes section 11.045 states. "'Lobbying' means influencing or attempting to influence legislative action or nonaction through oral or written communication or an attempt to obtain the goodwill of a member or employee of the legislature."
(And I doubt most officers would spend their own money going there if they werent' be reimbursed by someone!)
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Articles Menu
Find Info
Latest Comments
Member Login
